Skip to content
ThreadOut
Health Freedom Defense Fund@theHFDF · Jan 6, 2026

A federal court quietly ruled that the government can force ANY medical intervention on you—with no evidence or…

2 tweets1 min read♥ 11.8Koriginal

Summary

A Ninth Circuit Court ruling allowed government mandates for medical interventions under "public health" justifications without evidence or judicial review. Health advocacy groups have petitioned the Supreme Court to review this decision, arguing it threatens fundamental liberty and could normalize "Covid-era tyranny."

Summarized by ThreadOut AI from the full thread. May miss nuance — read the thread below.

  1. #1

    A federal court quietly ruled that the government can force ANY medical intervention on you—with no evidence or judicial review. Almost no one noticed. The Ninth Circuit said as long as officials say “public health,” courts shouldn’t question them. But we just fought back. We just petitioned the Supreme Court to review this unprecedented ruling. This may become the most consequential Supreme Court case of the 21st century. “This case is not just about the Covid crisis,” said HFDF President and Founder Leslie Manookian. “It’s about the future of liberty in America.” Nicole Shanahan called the Ninth Circuit’s ruling “TERRIFYING.” She’s right. The Ninth Circuit’s ruling threatens to make Covid-era tyranny the new normal:🧵

  2. #2

    Read our FULL press release: Lawsuit urges US Supreme Court to review Ninth Circuit ruling that allows virtually limitless state power under the guise of public health healthfreedomdefense.org/lawsuit-urges-…