Democrats got caught red-handed spreading a hoax about President Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. They misled the public,…

Democrats got caught red-handed spreading a hoax about President Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. They misled the public, lied about witness testimony, doctored documents, and are now scrambling to cover it up. 🧵 We have the receipts they don't want you to read:

1/ Let's start with former AG Bill Barr. Democrats claimed "Barr could not clear Trump of wrongdoing" after his deposition. What did Barr actually say? That there was NO evidence, and that if SDNY had anything on Trump, they would've indicted him. They didn't.

2/ Then came Alexander Acosta. Democrats tried to smear Trump by linking him to Epstein via the 2007 case. But Acosta crushed their narrative. He testified that he never spoke, emailed, or had ANY contact with Trump about Epstein. None. EVER.

3/ So what did Democrats do? They leaked 3 cherry-picked emails out of 23,000 pages—then made their own redactions to hide exonerating facts. One name they blacked out? Virginia Giuffre. Why? Because she publicly said she NEVER saw Trump do anything wrong.

4/ Another Democrat redaction for their hoax? Prince Andrew. Why? Because the redacted context changes the email. They were fabricating a smear campaign, not telling the truth.

5/ Then they lied about who did the redactions. Rep. Crockett and others went on CNN pretending they had no idea who made the edits. CNN corrected them live, saying Democrats made the redactions. Watch 👇🏻

Oversight Committee@GOPoversight · Nov 12, 2025

BRUTAL! Jasmine Crockett gets called out live by CNN for Democrats redacting Epstein documents to try to smear President Trump with their fake narrative. 🤥 CNN: " She did not accuse [Trump] of any wrongdoing." Crockett: " I don't know why they would necessarily redact someone's name who is deceased at this point." CNN: "The Democrats redacted." Crockett: **gibberish cover-up attempt**

6/ We released everything. 23,000 pages. Suddenly, the same Democrats who spent months screaming "release the files" told the NYT that doing so was meant to "disorient" and "distract." So much for transparency!

7/ Then the fake and dishonest NYT quietly edited their piece, removing the word "disorient" with no editor's note. They are literally helping Democrats rewrite history after their hoax fell apart. Disinformation in real time. 👇🏻

Oversight Committee@GOPoversight · Nov 13, 2025

SCANDAL: The FAKE and DISHONEST New York Times is colluding with Democrats by editing their Epstein stories. Original version: Dems accused us of trying to "disorient" the public by releasing all the Epstein docs we have. New version: That word's GONE. Why? Because the hoax against President Trump backfired. No editor's note. No corrections. Glenn Thrush, Annie Karni, and Devlin Barrett are running comms for the DNC. Not journalism

8/ But here's what no one is talking about... In 2019, Democrat @StaceyPlaskett was texting with Jeffrey Epstein during an actual House hearing. Epstein helped Plaskett question a discredited witness who hated Trump. None other than Michael Cohen. 🎥 @washingtonpost:

9/ While Plaskett worked with Epstein to attack Trump, Democrats now want you to believe they care about the victims? They don't. They ignored Clinton's connections, buried exculpatory facts, and made targeted redactions to select documents to smear President Trump. Shameful.

10/ The New York Post front page said it best: "DIRTY CLICKS." The Epstein 'bombshell' blew up in their faces. 23,000 pages prove it was another Dem hoax, buried by media allies trying to bail them out.

11/ Enough with the lies. We've released ALL the documents—65,000 pages to date. No cherry-picking, no cover-ups. Democrats? They only released NINE. Americans deserve the full truth—not whatever version helps Democrats spin another hoax. 📄 Read our memo exposing the truth: oversight.house.gov/report/staff-m…