Skip to content
ThreadOut
Mike Lee@BasedMikeLee · Dec 8, 2024

đŸ§”1. @MeetThePress omits six words about birthright citizenship from the 14th Amendment The omitted text is set off by


12 tweets1 min read♄ 25.3Koriginal

Summary

The author criticizes Meet the Press for omitting the phrase 'and subject to the jurisdiction thereof' from the 14th Amendment when discussing birthright citizenship, arguing that Congress has constitutional power to limit birthright citizenship through legislation, as Senator Harry Reid proposed in 1993.

Summarized by ThreadOut AI from the full thread. May miss nuance — read the thread below.

  1. #1

    đŸ§”1. @MeetThePress omits six words about birthright citizenship from the 14th Amendment The omitted text is set off by asterisks: “All persons born 
 in the United States, *and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,* shall be citizens of the United States” Those words matter

    Libs of TikTok@libsoftiktok · Dec 8, 2024

    Trump says he plans to END birthright citizenship on day one. "We're the only country that has it. We're going to end that because it's ridiculous."

  2. #2

    2. Congress has the power to define what it means to be born in the United States “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”

  3. #3

    3. While current law contains no such restriction, Congress could pass a law defining what it means to be born in the United States “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” excluding prospectively from birthright citizenship individuals born in the U.S. to illegal aliens.

  4. #4

    4. This is an idea that has attracted lawmakers of both political parties.

  5. #5

    5. In fact, one of the first bills (at least in recent memory) that attempted to impose statutory limits on automatic birthright citizenship was introduced in 1993 by then-Senator Harry Reid, a Democrat, who later became the Democrats’ leader in the Senate.

  6. #6

    6. Senator Reid’s bill was called the Immigration Stabilization Act of 1993. Title X of that bill would have limited automatic birthright citizenship to children born in the United States to mothers who were either U.S. citizens or legal permanent residents at the time.

  7. #7

    7. The fact that federal law doesn’t currently impose such a restriction doesn’t mean that it couldn’t, and that’s why Senator Harry Reid proposed that change.

  8. #8

    8. Nothing in the Fourteenth Amendment limits Congress’s ability to enact legislation limiting birthright citizenship along the lines of what Senator Harry Reid proposed in 1993.

  9. #9

    9. Those who suggest Congress is somehow powerless to limit birthright citizenship ignore important constitutional text giving Congress power define who among those “born in the United States” is born “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”

  10. #10

    10. It bothers me that @MeetThePress, long revered as America’s leading Sunday political news program, has become so one-sided.

  11. #11

    @MeetThePress 11. In this instance, @MeetThePress seems to try to render a debatable matter beyond debate by selectively omitting key words from the Constitution, making it appear incorrectly that the Fourteenth Amendment proscribes any and all restrictions on birthright citizenship.

  12. #12

    @MeetThePress 12. Please follow if you’d like to see more posts like this one.