Skip to content
ThreadOut
Robert W Malone, MD@RWMaloneMD · Jun 19, 2026

Fauci funded the Wuhan research. Then he helped steer the intelligence that cleared it. Gabbard's final act as DNI was…

9 tweets1 min read♥ 21.6Koriginal

Summary

Declassified documents released by Tulsi Gabbard allegedly show Dr. Fauci funded coronavirus research at the Wuhan institute while simultaneously advising the intelligence community on origins and publicly dismissing lab leak theories, creating a conflict of interest. The documents corroborate a CIA whistleblower's testimony that Fauci consulted with cherry-picked scientists, influenced the scientific consensus, and gave misleading testimony about his communications with intelligence agencies.

Summarized by ThreadOut AI from the full thread. May miss nuance — read the thread below.

  1. #1

    Fauci funded the Wuhan research. Then he helped steer the intelligence that cleared it. Gabbard's final act as DNI was to declassify the proof. And it confirms what a CIA whistleblower had already sworn to Congress weeks earlier. What the documents actually show. 🧵

  2. #2

    Start with the conflict of interest, because everything grows from it. Fauci ran NIAID, which funded the Wuhan coronavirus work through EcoHealth. He then advised the intelligence community on the virus origins. And he was the public voice calling the lab leak a conspiracy theory. Funder. Adviser. Spokesman. One man.

  3. #3

    He never had to dictate a conclusion. He only had to pick the experts. The documents show Fauci handing the IC a list of scientists to consult, many funded by his own institute. The IC took the list. Their input became "the assessment." That assessment was then sold to the public as independent consensus. A closed loop.

  4. #4

    The same trick built the scientific cover. In February 2020 Fauci took part in the call that produced "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2," the paper used for years to declare the lab leak debunked. Privately, its authors told each other the virus features "(potentially) look engineered." Nature Medicine still refuses to retract it.

  5. #5

    Then there is the part said under oath. In 2024 Fauci was asked if he had ever discussed viral research with the FBI, CIA, DIA, or any intelligence agency. He answered: "not to my knowledge about COVID." The files include the dated readouts of those exact briefings. His testimony was untrue.

  6. #6

    And the analysts who saw through it paid for it. A contractor fired days after coming forward. Promotions tied to toeing the line. Whistleblower anonymity stripped. All referred to the Inspector General. The view they were punished for is the one the FBI, DOE, CIA, and Congress all later adopted. It was never a conspiracy theory.

  7. #7

    Here is the part almost no one is discussing. Five weeks before this release, CIA officer James Erdman, who led ODNI's own origins investigation, testified to all of this under oath. Same meeting. Same emails. Same fired contractor. The testimony came first. Gabbard's documents proved him right.

  8. #8

    And one of his claims reaches higher than Fauci. Erdman testified that the CIA obstructed the declassification and surveilled the investigators themselves. The release does not address that allegation. It rests, for now, on his sworn word. If it holds, this stops being about one man.

  9. #9

    We read the primary documents so you do not have to take anyone's word for it. The full analysis, every source linked. Read it, then decide who lied to you. malone.news/p/manufactured…