Skip to content
ThreadOut
#YeThikKarkeDikhao@YTKDIndia · Jan 1, 2026

Meet BJP's Hema Malini, MP from Mathura, UP. She has been representing Mathura since 2014. Now, let's look at the…

9 tweets1 min read♥ 8.1Koriginal

Summary

An investigation into BJP MP Hema Malini's MPLADS fund usage in Mathura reveals potential irregularities, with multiple distinct projects claiming completion using identical photographs, raising questions about actual project completion and fund utilization accountability.

Summarized by ThreadOut AI from the full thread. May miss nuance — read the thread below.

  1. #1

    Meet BJP's Hema Malini, MP from Mathura, UP. She has been representing Mathura since 2014. Now, let's look at the works carried out during Hema Malini's tenure through the lens of the Central Govt's MPLADS website. A thread 🧵

  2. #2

    18th Lok Sabha Allocated Limit: ₹9.80 Crore Expenditure: ₹2.89 Crore Works Recommended: 45 Works Completed: 11

  3. #3

    17th Lok Sabha (2019-2024) A total of 110 works were recommend, but only 102 were completed. Out of ₹9.81 crore sanctioned, only ₹9.64 Crore was utilised.

  4. #4

    So, here is the problem. Two projects were completed at costs of 16.82 lakh and ₹15.49 lakh. However, the same photo was uploaded for both projects on the MPLADS portal

  5. #5

    The same issue appears in another case. Two projects worth ₹21.19 lakh and ₹12.14 lakh were recorded, but the same photos were uploaded for both projects.

  6. #6

    Another Two different projects worth ₹5.09 lakh and ₹5.54 lakh were completed, but the same images were uploaded again for both projects.

  7. #7

    Another case Two different projects worth ₹8.19 lakh and ₹11.68 lakh were completed, but the same photographs were uploaded again for both projects.

  8. #8

    Few Questions > Why were the same photographs uploaded for multiple, different projects with separate budgets? > If these were distinct works, where is the photographic proof showing each project separately on the ground? > Why were geo-tagged photographs not uploaded?

  9. #9

    > Who verified these projects as "completed" without unique, location-specific evidence? > If geo-tagged photos exist, why are they not publicly available on MPLADS portal? > How can citizens trust the completion claims when identical photos are used for different projects?